A 76-year-old widower, identified as John, faced a distressing ordeal due to a clerical error by his energy supplier, E.ON. For nearly a year, John had to ration his electricity and rely on charity food handouts after receiving an erroneous bill amounting to nearly £13,000.
John, who suffers from a serious heart condition, had been using a prepayment meter for his electricity for the past decade. However, E.ON began sending him inexplicable bills and even threatened legal action if he didn’t pay. The company also withheld his £400 energy bill support scheme payment from the government, intended to assist with winter heating expenses.
Feeling overwhelmed, John, a retired joiner dependent on a basic state pension, considered ending his life due to the stress caused by the situation. He stopped heating his home and cooking meals as the bills escalated, fearing disconnection of his supply. Eventually, he was referred to a food charity by concerned health workers.
After the intervention of The Guardian, E.ON discovered that it was charging John for readings from an unrelated meter and promptly cancelled the erroneous bills. Prior to this resolution, John had been a recluse, refusing to answer the door or phone in fear of debt collectors.
Similar billing errors have affected other energy customers, causing significant financial distress. Martyn James, a consumer rights campaigner, expressed concern over businesses’ failure to promptly address such errors and the consequences for affected individuals.
Despite John being medically vulnerable and the family repeatedly informing E.ON about his situation, the company continued threatening debt collectors if the bill remained unpaid. After contacting the energy ombudsman, John received poor customer service compensation, but the meter mix-up remained unresolved.
E.ON promised to investigate after The Guardian’s intervention but sent another letter stating John owed £12,864. Eventually, E.ON acknowledged the mistake and attributed it to a wrongly assigned meter. The company refused to elaborate on the error or explain why it hadn’t been identified earlier. Following this acknowledgment, E.ON replaced John’s meter, reimbursed him for energy bill support vouchers, and offered a goodwill payment for the distress caused.
Despite the resolution, John received yet another letter stating he owed £20,537.82, further adding to his ordeal. E.ON apologized for the confusion and stated that it would investigate the matter to prevent future occurrences. The utilities regulator, Ofgem, was contacted regarding the case and has referred it to its compliance team.
The incident raises concerns about the need for better coordination and efficient mechanisms to address billing errors and customer complaints in the energy sector. Vulnerable individuals like John, who rely on basic pensions and support schemes, ought to be protected from such distressing experiences. Energy companies should be held accountable for their mistakes and undertake measures to prevent such errors from recurring in the future. The House of Commons and relevant government authorities should inquire into cases like John’s to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to protect consumers and prevent similar incidents in the future.
For more on mis-selling, visit: https://www.energybrokers.co.uk/news/electricity/energy-mis-selling-how-much-are-you-due